In the midst of a dispute over non -metri -use issues, how the BitCoin network is used is reported that a collective statement from the 31 Bitcoin Corps developers has given rise to a global debate between Bit Covers.
“It is not verifying or condolences the use of non -financial data, but accepting that BitCoin can be used for the use of censorship, and not everyone agrees,” said the BitCoin Corps website on June 6, saying.
Bitcoin -mandate are “not in position” to keep the mandate
The letter argued that BitCoin (BTC) is a network that is “described by its users” and its basic assistants are not in position “which software or policies they want. This comes in the middle of the ongoing debate on Spam Shalhli on the Bit Coin network.
He added, “Staying free to run any software is the basic protection of the network against oppression.”
Although many Bitcoin supported updates with “ACK” comments, others objected.
January 3 CEO Samson Mao criticized the letter of the letter on the same day. He said, “It is disgusting to say only that” it is now what is now, very bad. “
“Butt Coin Core is slowly changing the network to enable Davis Spam and now looks focused on removing obstacles for the spamners,” Move said. He added, “This statement itself is inappropriate.
On May 8, Bitcoin Corps developers decided to remove a longtime limit on the transaction data in the network upgrade to allow large data parts, which some bitcoin saw opening the door to non -financial use issues.
However, Casa founder Jameson Loop defended the letter. “Corps Davis is a group that says that we cannot force anyone to run the code they do not like. This is our thinking about relay policy and network health.”
The Loop added, “When there was no compatible message, and it was only a group of Independent Developers who made individual statements, BitCoin Corps were accused of” public relations. ” “
“Now a joint statement has been published, and people have reasons for crying about it.”
The developers argued in the letter that it is better for BitCoin node software that “a realistic idea is to take care of what will end in the next block, rather than trying to interfere with the transaction’s creators and miners, which is largely harmless at the technical level.” He added:
“Although we acknowledge that this theory is not globally kept by all consumers and developers, it is our sincere belief that it is in the best interest of BitCoin and its users, and we hope our users will agree.”
Related: Is the price of a bitcoin rally up to K 150K by the end of the year?
Butt Coin Carl Harton said, “This is a bit” coin “a little” bucket “or a little” store “or whatever common purpose data store.
Meanwhile, Bitcoin Corps developer Luke Dashper criticized the goals of the transaction relay policy stated in the statement. “The goals of the transaction relay listed are basically all wrong,” said Dashper.
“The mining that will be predicted is a central purpose,” said the Dashper. Expecting Spam’s mining is a defeat. It is harmful to help promote Spam. “
The developers said that the basic goals of the transaction relay are predicting that BitCoin’s transactions will be mined, “as expected of mining,” sharpening block spread “, and helping BitCoin know about the transaction of paying fees.
Magazine: Baby 79T worth Baby Boomers are finally riding with Bitcoin
