Decoding Mark Zuckerberg’s ‘personal superintelligence” plan for Meta

It’s been another busy week. The GPT-5 appears exactly around the corner …

This week, I do de -code the meaning behind it Mark Zuckerberg’s What does this mean for the “Personal Superintendent” manifesto, and the wider AI race. Keep reading for my chat with the Figma Executive on the company’s IPO Day, a group of good links, and some opinions from last week’s issue.

What is the really “personal sprintylin” for Metaa

Meta has withdrawn from trying to defeat Chattagpt in her own game.

If you read between lines, there is a message behind Mark Zuckerberg’s “Personal Superintendent” Charter. For the past one year, it has pushed Meta AI assistant to almost every level in an attempt to reduce the development of chatgot. This did not work. Now, since Zuckerberg spends a lot of restarting the Meta’s AI strategy, he is honoring the company’s attention that it has historically dominated it: winning your attention.

In that NetfredmanStylized Blog Post, Zuckerberg, said he thinks how it will work in the AI era: “If trends continue, then you will expect people to spend less time in productive software, and more time to create and connect.

Although the target of the Chattagpat is to be a “super assistant” that works more faster by you, the purpose of Meta is to fill your theoretically returning time. This strategy, while potentially pays more and more to the basic powers of Distopian, Meta: maximizing engagement and improving this engagement by someone else. The idea that MetaThis wants to fill the finish time created by AI-based AI-that’s the Zuckerberg and its deputies, internally and directly for the recruiters.

Meta CPO, “We need to distinguish here by not focusing on productive potential.” Meta CPO Chris Cox He told employees during the All -Hands Meeting last month. “We are on entertainment, with friends, in this regard, how people live their lives, on all the things we perform well individually.”

Meta can do and do a lot to the creators easily publish a variety of content and reach more and more people. But moving forward, I expect the company to use AI to encourage its apps more personal engagement through more personal advertising, watch the Better at the level of better rails (or to create them from the beginning), and to encourage dialogue with AI personalities. This is probably no coincidence that “Personal Sprintilins” was developed by the first Character Dot A co -founder Nam ShazirWho discussed joining the meta before joining Google last year….

In -the -the Hedon Field And I discussed AI Talent Wars this week Decoader. We dropped some reporting during the Meta -related podcast, which I will expand here: Yes, Zuckerberg is offering a huge, bigger offering to hire AI talent services. But the offer is not as easy as the headlines have made them.

People who have seen the offer tell me that they are more structured like executive pay with specific performance goals (they are paid by the performance stock units, not limited stock units that get the largest tech employees) and if you go back to the money, the amount of money returns. Given the strings that are connected, it is easy to see why Zuckerberg, then left, did not succeed in getting everyone’s services.

“Apple should do it. Apple will do it. It’s like ours. We will invest to do it.” – Apple’s CEO Tim kick Talk about AI during the employees’ meeting meeting.

“Base Model Startup Companies are divided into 1. Soon 13 -digit winners (new rounds, new investors, high prices) 2 – Legards (A) niche or buyer (new rounds, one investors, not yet -designed to search for the search. Hunter Walk

“I will not say that research on the investigation is completed. But now that the models are the edges of the capabilities that can be measured by classical standards and many long -standing challenges we are thinking that we are starting to fall, we are at a place where the models are really in the real world.” – Openi Chief Scientists Jacob Pachuki

“Two decades ago, the design was a lipstick on a pig. Now the design you win or lose.” – CEO of Figma Delin Field

A quick chat with Figma’s CPO

One of the questions around Figma’s blockbuster IPO this week is whether the AI will eventually summarize the need for a device like Figma, or will make it more useful.

Figma believes that the team’s focus on supporting it will help to tolerate the rise of the ‘Web Design’ tools, as dear. After helping to play the opening bell at the New York Stock Exchange on Thursday, I caught with CPO Yuki Yamshita. He told me, “When I think of the future, I think about where the highest price activity is going to happen.” “And to me, all this is aligning as a team you are building, and the other activity is taking an idea and is really improving it.”

Like her boss, Delin FieldYamshita sees the design as a key distinction in the world full of AI-breed software. “If you decide that it is an interesting idea to pursue it, continue to repeat it, this is something that will make this product different, especially in a world where more and more people are producing more products. And I think that is a platform where people are working fast.”

I buy this argument, but I can also see that the maximum use of Figma has been changed by the AI-local startup. Fortunately for Figma, the field is one (if not ) Right now the most well -affiliated angel investor in the AI startups. In view of its openness to the M&A, I would expect that Figma will achieve something to help move forward in the coming constituencies.

Interesting career runs this week:

Answers Google’s last week’s issue about Google:

If you don’t have before, don’t forget to subscribe StuffyWhich includes unlimited access The command line And all our reporting.

As always, I welcome your comments. You can answer here or safely give me the signal.