On Tuesday, US District Judge Amanda Barelus Ford approved a long preliminary order, which forbids Adho from imposing crimes related to illegal admission and immigration immigration.
A federal judge has issued a preliminary order against a controversial Ideo Law, which could allow the state to prosecute certain immigration crimes in its courts.
According to Adho Capital SunAdhu Legislature passed a new law in 2023. It describes a new category of immigration crime, including crimes of “illegal admission” and “illegal re -enrollment” crimes. Except for these provisions, the law “makes smuggling a dangerous illegal stranger.
This rule may also apply to many non -documentary immigrants in Adho, as well as those who try to return to the state after the deportation. However, House Bill 83 contains a warning: Under the law, the only immigrants of deportation are those who have already convicted of another crime or who suspects they commit a crime related to another immigration.
The Adho Government Brad Little implemented the bill at the end of March, but its implementation was stopped hours later when a federal judge issued a temporary ban against the implementation. Later, the US citizen Liberties Union’s request for prevention was extended, alleging that his client suffered a “irreparable injury” without the immediate intervention of the court.
On Tuesday, US District Judge Amanda Barelus Ford approved a long preliminary order, which forbids Adho from imposing crimes related to illegal admission and immigration immigration.
The American Civil Liberties Union has already presented the decision of the Brailles Ford as a victory, although it is incomplete.
“We are happy that the court acknowledged that the implementation of the law is harmful and unconstitutional,” said ACLU of the Adho Staff Attorney. Adho Capital Sun. “We believe that this case will succeed in its qualities, and we hope that it sends a message to Adhu’s lawmakers that it is not the one to approve the anti -immigrant, unconstitutional legislation.”
Since filing a lawsuit in March, ACLU is hopeful about its chances of success.
“The courts of other states, which have approved these (anti -immigrant) laws, have agreed with our legal argument, and we expect the court to do so,” said ACLU, the legal director of Adho, and we expect the court to do so.
At a press conference, South Vick told reporters that the HB-83 is a cause for many reasons.
For example, the legalization alleges that the HB-83 violates the supremacy of the US constitution, which gives federal law over the state law. It has also presented the Commerce clause of the Constitution in an idea to go out and out and organize or manage the journey.
And finally, South Week says, the law is very vague for enforcement.
“This law was the result of a lack of lack of back between the House and the Senate, and it was in deciding which version of the bill would pass, and unfortunately, they did a version that was incomprehensible.” “And everyone, including our non -documentary community, has the right to understand the law so that they can know what the provisions of this law are and what they can violate.”
Sources
ACLU of Adho filed a lawsuit for the state’s new immigration enforcement bill that has just been signed in law
Federal Judge preliminary order stops new Ideo Immigration Law when the trial is underway
The immigration enforcement bill becomes a law after the signing of the governor of Adhu. ACLU of Adho announces legalization
