Nearly seven years after Ron Pearlman’s Hamptans’ house was set on fire, he is asking a New York state judge to force insurance companies to pay more than $ 400 million for five paintings, which they say has damaged the fire.
Two years after the fire, Pearlman heard a trial in Lower Manhattan today for a trial. In this case, he claimed that people belonging to London London Limited, Chab Limited and American International Group Inc. issued policies in which “the world’s largest private modern art collection was protected from any harm, no matter how trivial.” These included the works of Andy Warol and Si Tombali.
This is an unusual glimpse of conflicts between wealthy collectors and insurance companies, along with a rare peek behind the curtains of high steaks art collecting, many of whom are privately competed so that they can maintain their holding details from the market.
The trial-where the founder of the fort, can be testified-he is likely to highlight the current wealth of 82-year-old Pearlman, once in recent years, he was confronted as the richest America’s richest man. The closest associated business, Revlin Inc., filed for bankruptcy in 2022. The court case revealed that after the company he used, he sold about $ 1 billion worth of art and the lenders demanded payment.
Pearlman’s lawyer, C. Brian Wilson, said in his preliminary argument on Monday that his policies claim his client claims that insurance companies agreed to pay insurance companies many times higher than the price of their market – even if they suffered nominal harm. He said the insurance companies were “more happy” in accepting Pearlman’s premium payments.
‘Rain inside the house’
Wilson told Justice Joel M. Cohen, “Firefighters tried to ignite the fire,” It was raining effectively inside the house “and the five tasks were repeatedly cooled, moving at night, and sat in humidity for more than 12 hours, Wilson told Justice Joel M. Coenne Kohn Kohn. Payments, 11 of them were on the same floor where the competing work was hanging.
He said he was “sorry” on the contract he had signed with Pearlman, and “decided to draw a line in the sand.”
Insurance companies say the litigation is a “grip of money” that Pearlman has developed to make a payment for paintings, which he cannot prove that he is damaged. He questions his account that he never considered selling the arts and noticed that two pieces purchased by Griffin were hanging near the other five tasks when the fire started. Trying to sell the art can be suggested that Pearlman did not think he was harmed. Although Griffin is not a party to the matter, his testimony is a part of the evidence, and parts of his collection can be played in the trial.
In his preliminary statement, Jonathan Rosenburg, a lawyer for insurance companies, told the judge that controversial claims were filed when Pearlman had “serious financial difficulties” and encountered margin calls from his lenders, noting the sale of his art.
‘Kitchen sink’
“He throws a kitchen sink on this claim.” “He will admit that he was not aware of any real harm to the paintings at the time of claiming, because it was a financially running claim.”
“Due to Carter Lead Yard or Melbourne’s Managing Partner and Chair of the Firm’s Art Law Department, Judith Walis said,” Due to the capacity of the entire reservoir and the collector’s profile, the Pearman case is noteworthy. “
At the center of such legal battles, insurance policies are usually in the clauses of dispute resolution, which allows for action like a mediation that cannot be reviewed by the court.
“This is just a review of a very demanding standard, which requires fraud in the process itself,” he said. “It’s very difficult to overturn them.”
Jump in wealth
Pylon’s holding company, McDeriz and Forbes Inc., owns various high -profile brands, including Marvel, Colman and New World Entertainment. Today, he has two small biotechnology firms and workstations at stake, a check printing and financial solution business that exchanged hassle loans last year. Its wealth was estimated by the Bloomberg billionaire index in 2018, but by 2021, it fell to $ 3.3 billion by the time its calculation was closed.
It is expected that the trial will continue for about three weeks and will be exhibited for witnesses, including Perlman and a brocclin man who made frames for paintings. Jennifer Moss, who is also a chemist and expert in the scientific analysis of Fine Art, who will testify for Pearl Mann, and a conservator for defense, Marion McLeanburg, for defense.
The $ 410 million war broke out with a fire that broke out in Perlman Hampton State, The Creeks, in September 2018, which damaged residence and destroyed art and furniture. Insurance companies paid more than 100 million millions as a result.
But the five -fired works, which are linked to glasses like glasses and were removed from the residence without the initial sign of damage, were not included in the 2018 claims, though staff told insurance companies that they were being monitored. Next summer they were crawled on the Crax.
According to the testimony of a Pearl Main Executive, the paintings were insured several times for their market value to replace them with similar quality art, regardless of whether a collector is planning to sell. Unlike many insurance policies that cover the cost of repair, Pearlman’s policies allow him to exchange bad artwork for his full price.
For example, a painting in the dispute, can soup the cambul of WarholFor, for, for,. According to the court filing, despite a $ 12.5 million diagnosis in 2018, the million was insured at 100 million.
The case is some under -Writers in AGP Holdings, two LLC vs. London Lides, 654742/2020, New York State Supreme Court, New York County (Manhattan).
Picture: Members of the next staff of the Ed Rasa work titled “Stand Station 1966” at the British Museum of London. The painting is in a collection of parlman. (Bloomberg)
Copyright 2025 Bloomberg.
